FEATURES OF OUT-OF-COURT PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND INTERESTS IN RELATIONS ON THE PROVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES IN THE SPHERE OF CONSTRUCTION
Abstract
In the article, the author examines the features of extrajudicial protection of rights and interests inrelations on the provision of administrative services in the construction sector. The author pointsout the main problems regarding legal regulation and the application of such methods.The author substantiates the position that the right to protection can arise even in the case whenthe right of an individual is limited, that is, when a person, due to circumstances beyond hiscontrol, cannot realize it, since the state has created such implementation mechanisms that havecomplications.The author emphasizes that different interpretations of the correlation of the studied conceptsare always connected, in our opinion, with the industry aspect of the study and application tospecific legal relations. The importance of conditionally theoretical constructions of protectionand defence of administrative law can be important for determining how a person whose rightsare limited or violated will restore them, where the effectiveness of the implementation of state,judicial, and generally legal protection and defence of such a right is of great importance.The author argues that for administrative legal relations, their protection and defence do notdiffer by the method of legal regulation but may differ by the methods of such regulation.The author emphasizes that administrative appeals, the Ombudsman and mediation are important tools for resolving disputes at the level of EU institutions and agencies.In the author's opinion, mediation and conciliation can be aimed not only at ending withreconciliation, but the result can also be the cancellation, amendment of an administrative act,issuance of an administrative act of a certain content, withdrawal of an application or recognitionof the right to apply as justified. Such legalized legal consequences can eliminate doubts andignorance of the parties, as well as clarify the factual and legal circumstances of the applicationfor an administrative service in the field of construction.The author concludes that the maximum expansion of the system of alternative dispute resolutionmethods in the studied area will contribute to the effectiveness of the protection and defence ofadministrative rights, as well as trust in the state, where one can choose at one's own discretionthe method and means of protection that will be effective for a specific violation. Accordingly, theunloading of the judicial system can also positively affect the quality and efficiency of decisionsmade by courts and increase trust in the court in the state.
References
2. Kozhura L.O. (2015) Administratyvno-pravovyj zakhyst ta okhorona: ponjattja ta spivvidnoshennja [Administrative and legal protection and security: concepts and relationships]. Naukovyj visnyk Uzhghorodsjkogho nacionaljnogho universytetu. Serija : Pravo [Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law]. vol. 35(1.2). pp. 119–122.
3. Kravchenko Ju.F. (1998) Aktualjni problemy reformuvannja OVS Ukrajiny (orghanizacijnopravovi pytannja) [Current problems of reforming the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine (organizational and legal issues)]: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttja nauk. stupenja kand. juryd. nauk: spec. 12.00.07. (in Ukrainian)
4. Administratyvne pravo Ukrajiny. Povnyj kurs [Administrative Law of Ukraine. Full course] (2018). pidruchnyk / V. Ghalunjko, P. Dikhtijevsjkyj, O. Kuzjmenko, S. Stecenko ta in. Kherson : Oldi-pljus. 446 p.
5. Meljnychenko B. (2022) Administratyvno-pravovi zasoby zakhystu prav, svobod ta interesiv pryvatnykh osib u sferi publichnogho upravlinnja [Administrative and legal means of protecting the rights, freedoms and interests of private individuals in the field of public administration]. Visnyk Nacionaljnogho universytetu «Ljvivsjka politekhnika». Serija: «Jurydychni nauky» [Bulletin of the National University «Lviv Polytechnic». Series: «Legal Sciences»]. vol 2 (34). pp. 64–69.
6. Verba-Sydor O.B. (ed.) (2021) Aljternatyvni sposoby vyrishennja cyviljnykh sporiv za zakonodavstvom Ukrajiny [Alternative methods of resolving civil disputes under the legislation of Ukraine] : navchaljnyj posibnyk: Ljviv, Ljvivsjkyj derzhavnyj universytet vnutrishnikh sprav. 416 p.
7. Rudnycjka, O.P., Dem'janjuk, V.M. (2022) Nejurysdykcijni sposoby zakhystu cyviljnykh prav [Non-jurisdictional methods of protecting civil rights.]. Aktualjni problemy vitchyznjanoji jurysprudenciji [Current problems of domestic jurisprudence]. vol 6. pp. 63–69.
8. Verba I.O. (2021) Mediacija v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi: problemy teoriji ta praktyky [Mediation in administrative proceedings: problems of theory and practice.]. Naukovyj visnyk Dnipropetrovsjkogho derzhavnogho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav [Scientific Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs]. 2021. vol 3 (112). pp. 186–190.
9. Pyshna A.Gh. (2012) Zastosuvannja mediaciji dlja ureghuljuvannja administratyvnykh sporiv [Application of mediation for the settlement of administrative disputes.]. Pivdennoukrajinsjkyj pravnychyj chasopys [South Ukrainian Law Journal.]. vol. 3. pp. 147–149.
10. Boghucjka L.P. (2016) Mediacija u vyrishenni publichno-pravovykh sporiv. Retrieved from: https://ukrainepravo.com/scientific-thought/naukova-dumka/zaprovadzhennya-med-ats-yakalternativnogo-shlyakhu-vir-shennya-publ-chno-pravovikh-spor-v/.(access: 27.05.2024).
11. Ghorecjkyj O. (2019) Mediacija v adminsudochynstvi – nemozhlyve mozhlyvo? [Mediation in administrative justice – the impossible is possible?] Jurydychna ghazeta online [Legal newspaper online.]. 2019. vol 16 (670). Retrieved from: https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/inshe/mediaciya-v-adminsudochinstvi-nemozhlive-mozhlivo.html. (access: 27.05.2024).
12. Rostovsjka K.V., Ghryshyna N.V. (2020) Mediacija v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi: mif chy realiji sjoghodennja [Mediation in administrative proceedings: myth or present-day realities]. Visnyk Kharkivsjkogho nacionaljnogho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. Serija : Pravo [Bulletin of the V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Law]. 2020. vol 29. pp. 182–188.
13. Rekomendacija Rec (2001) 9 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Jevropy derzhavam-chlenam shhodo aljternatyv sudovomu rozghljadu sporiv mizh administratyvnymy orghanamy j storonamy—pryvatnymy osobamy [Recommendation Rec 9 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on alternatives to judicial review of disputes between administrative authorities and private parties] Retrieved from: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/Rec_2001_9_2001_09_05.pdf (access: 27.05.2024).
14. Dragos D.C., Neamtu B. (2014) Alternative Dispute Resolution in European Administrative Law. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 605 p. (in English).
15. Guidelines for a better implementation of the existing Recommendation on alternatives to litigation between administrative authorities and private parties. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/1680747683 (access: 27.05.2024).
16. Litvins G. (2016) Alternative methods of judical protection and dispute resolution in administrative law. ELTE Law Journal. vol 1. pp. 371–286.
17. Haft F., Schlieffen K. (2009) Handbuch Mediation. München: Verlag C.H.Beck. 345 р. (in English).
