ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTIONING OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN THE CURRENT CONDITIONS OF MARTIAL LAW

  • Olesia Kozakevych National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
  • Alina Romanenko National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
Keywords: access to justice, administrative process, e-court, UJITS, jurisdiction, territorial, subject matter jurisdiction, mobilisation, administrative case

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to analyse the peculiarities of the functioning ofadministrative court proceedings under the current legal regime of martial law. Methods. The methodology of the article is based on the use of general scientific, interdisciplinaryand special legal methods of cognition, including historical and legal, dialectical, sociologicaland comparative legal methods. These methods, in combination with the scientific principles ofcomprehensiveness of research, objectivity, scientific rigour and validity, provided a comprehensivestudy of the functioning of administrative justice under modern martial law.Results. The article emphasises that without proper access to justice, it is impossible to exercisea wide range of human rights. Having analysed the functioning of the judicial system, it can benoted that at the beginning of the full-scale invasion, there was a problem with the administrativeproceedings in the occupied territories. However, the judicial system was able to cope withthe challenges of reality and began to work in a modified format that takes into account thepeculiarities of martial law. The author analyses the relevant legal acts adopted by the VerkhovnaRada of Ukraine, recommendations of the Supreme Court and the Council of Judges of Ukraineaimed at ensuring accessibility and continuity of administrative proceedings under martial law. Itis argued that the functioning of administrative proceedings under martial law should continue,in particular, the consideration of administrative cases and their resolution should continue. Theauthor emphasises that practical steps should be taken to improve the situation in the field ofadministrative justice, which the Parliament is trying to eliminate by adopting amendments tolegislation. It is proved that changing the territorial jurisdiction of courts affects the functioningand accessibility of justice for citizens.Conclusions. The functioning of administrative court proceedings under the current martiallaw regime is characterised by the fact that the regime of a particular administrative court isdetermined individually, since it depends on the situation in a particular region. Accordingly, itcan be stated that the legislator takes into account the peculiarities of the martial law regime andintroduces procedural simplifications of administrative proceedings and changes in the territorialjurisdiction of administrative courts. In connection with the expansion of the subject matterjurisdiction in relation to the specifics of proceedings on claims filed by the territorial recruitmentand social support centre regarding the temporary restriction of Ukrainian citizens’ right to drivea vehicle during mobilisation, another category of public law disputes arises, in the course ofwhich the latest case law will be formed. The use of e-justice is an effective means of ensuringthe continuous functioning of administrative proceedings. In this regard, it is necessary to ensureinformation security mechanisms against cyber threats. The issue of creating legal mechanismsthat will more effectively implement fair, impartial and timely consideration and resolution ofadministrative cases, including access to justice and effective protection of the rights, freedomsand interests of citizens, is also relevant.

References

1. Jak pracjuje sudova systema pid chas vijny? Sudova praktyka [How does the judicial system work in times of war? Judicial practice]. Retrieved from: https://surl.li/todzz [in Ukrainian].
2. Pro pravovyj rezhym vojennogho stanu: Zakon Ukrainу vid 12. 05.2015 № 389-VIII [On the legal regime of martial law: Law of Ukraine dated 12 May 2015 No. 389-VIII]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/389-19#Text (access 23 April 2024) [in Ukrainian].
3. Pryvydencev O.Gh. Osoblyvosti zdijsnennja administratyvnogho sudochynstva v umovakh vojennogho stanu [Peculiarities of administrative proceedings under martial law]. Prykarpatsjkyjjurydychnyj visnyk, 2022. No 1(42). P. 54–57 [in Ukrainian].
4. Kozakevych O.M. Dostupnistj pravosuddja u tranzytyvnomu suspiljstvi: suchasnyj vymir [Accessibility of justice in a transitional society: modern dimension]. Odesa: Yurydyka, 2023 [in Ukrainian].
5. Naghaljni pytannja dijaljnosti administratyvnykh sudiv i problemy pravozastosuvannja: u Verkhovnomu Sudi vidbulasja rozshyrena robocha zustrich [Urgent issues of administrative courts and problems of law enforcement: an extended working meeting was held in the Supreme Court]. Retrieved from: http://surl.li/tocwo [in Ukrainian].
6. Kodeks administratyvnogho sudochynstva Ukrajiny: Zakon Ukrainу vid 06.07.2005 № 2747-IV [Administrative Judicial Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine dated 6 July 2005 No. 2747-IV]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text [in Ukrainian].
7. Pro sudoustrij i status suddiv: Zakon Ukrainу vid 02.06.2016 № 1402-VIII [On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges: Law of Ukraine dated 2 June 2016 No. 1402-VIII]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text [in Ukrainian].
8. Pro mobilizacijnu pidghotovku ta mobilizaciju: Zakon Ukrainу vid 21.11.1993 № 3543-XII [On mobilisation training and mobilisation: Law of Ukraine dated 21.10.1993 No 3543-XII]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3543-12#Text [in Ukrainian].
9. Pro vnesennja zmin do dejakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shhodo okremykh pytanj prokhodzhennja vijsjkovoji sluzhby, mobilizaciji ta vijsjkovogho obliku: Zakon Ukrainy vid 11.04.2024 № 3633-IX, nabyraje chynnosti [On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Certain Issues of Military Service, Mobilisation and Military Registration: Law of Ukraine dated 11.04.2024 No. 3633-IX, entered into force]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3633-20#Text [in Ukrainian].
10. Rishennja Rady suddiv Ukrainy vid 24.02.2022 № 9 [Decision of the Council of Judges of Ukraine dated 24 February 2022 No. 9]. Retrieved from: http://surl.li/toech [in Ukrainian].
11. Zhuk A. Osoblyvosti zastosuvannja procesualjnykh norm v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi v umovakh vojennogho stanu: Verkhovnyj sud [Supreme Court: Peculiarities of application of procedural rules in administrative proceedings under martial law]. Sudova vlada Ukrainy. Verkhovnyj sud, 2023. Retrieved from: http://surl.li/toedc [in Ukrainian].
12. Proekt Zakonu pro vnesennja zmin do Cyviljnogho procesualjnogho kodeksu Ukrainy, Ghospodarsjkogho procesualjnogho kodeksu Ukrainy, Kodeksu administratyvnogho sudochynstva Ukrainy shhodo vyznachennja pidsudnosti sprav za misceznakhodzhennjam storony, jaka je vnutrishnjo peremishhenoju osoboju, vid 13.10.2023 № 10146 [Draft Law on Amendments to the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine on Determining the Jurisdiction of Cases at the Location of a Party Who is an Internally Displaced Person dated 13.10.2023 No. 10146]. Retrieved from: https://itd.rada.gov.ua/billInfo/Bills/Card/42984 [in Ukrainian].
13. Shhodo rekomendacij z orghanizacijnykh pytanj robotysuddiv v umovakh vojennogho stanu: Rishennja Rady suddiv Ukrainy vid 05.08.2022 № 23 [On recommendations on organisational issues of judges’ work under martial law: Decision of the Council of Judges of Ukraine dated 05.08.2022 No. 23]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0023414-22#Text [in Ukrainian].
14. Ofis Rady Jevropy v Ukraini: Prezentovano novyj Vysnovok Konsuljtatyvnoji rady jevropejsjkykh suddiv № 26 pro vykorystannja dopomizhnykh tekhnologhij u sudochynstvi [Council of Europe Office in Ukraine: Presentation of the new Opinion of the Advisory Council of European Judges No. 26 on the use of assistive technologies in judicial proceedings]. Retrieved from: http://surl.li/tpcpa [in Ukrainian].
15. Pro vnesennja zmin do dejakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shhodo obov’jazkovoji rejestraciji ta vykorystannja elektronnykh kabinetiv v Jedynij sudovij informacijnotelekomunikacijnij systemi abo jiji okremij pidsystemi (moduli), shho zabezpechuje obmin dokumentamy: Zakon Ukrainy № 3200-IX vid 29.06.2023 r. [On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding Mandatory Registration and Use of Electronic Offices in the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System or its Separate Subsystem (Module) Enabling Document Exchange: Law of Ukraine dated 29.06.2023 No 3200-IX]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3200-20#Text [in Ukrainian].
Published
2024-07-12
How to Cite
Kozakevych, O., & Romanenko, A. (2024). ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTIONING OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN THE CURRENT CONDITIONS OF MARTIAL LAW. Administrative Law and Process, (2), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796X.2024.2.03
Section
Administrative process (Administrative legal proceedings)