• Olena Krasnozhon Prosecutor General’s Office
Keywords: representation, property and non-property claims, binding claims, prosecutor, children, prosecutor’s office


Purpose. Child protection plays a significant role in the functioning of the prosecutor’s office, particularly in the representation of state interests in the field of child protection. Fair, impartial and timely resolution of disputes in the field of public law relations by the court in order to effectively protect the rights, freedoms and interests of individuals from violations by public authorities is, in turn, the task of administrative proceedings. This article aims is to examine the legal nature of administrative property and non-property claims, binding claims in relation in the area of child protection, and their correlation with non-property claims. Methods. The article employs a scientific methodology for legal research, including systemic-structural, comparative-legal, generalization, dialectic, analysis, and synthesis methods. Results. This study examines the practice of administrative claims by prosecutors and their corresponding statistical data. The categories of administrative claims are grouped, and the article explores the concept of administrative property and non-property claims. It is also examining binding claims in the field of the child protection. Provides examples of property claims, binding claims, claims with material component in the field of the child protection. Finally, the study examines legislative shortcomings. Conclusions. The unique focus on children, their rights, freedoms, interests, and state interests, as well as the corresponding subject of the claim, determine the features of the prosecutor’s office’s function for representation of state interests in the field of child protection. The analysis of legislation reveals the lack of administrative property and non-property claims, binding claims, and claim pricing. To establish a clear differentiation between property and non-property claims, at this stage of the study it is proposed to enhance the current legislation. This legislative will enable claims to be made in accordance with substantive and procedural legal norms. This, in turn, will increase the effectiveness of the representation function in the field of child protection in the administrative procedures.


1. Zakon Ukrainy “Hospodarskyy protsesualnyy kodeks Ukrainy” (1991). [The Commercial Procedural Code of Ukraine] (1991) № 1798-XII. Retrieved from #Text [in Ukrainian].
2. Zakon Ukrainy “Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy” (2005) [The Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine] (2005) № 2747-IV (2005). Retrieved from: [in Ukrainian].
3. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu (2020) [Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court] (2020) № 910/13737/19. Retrieved from: [in Ukrainian].
4. Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu (2021) [Resolution of the Supreme Court] (2021) № 923/938/20. Retrieved from: [in Ukrainian].
5. Pro zastosuvannia sudamy zakonodavstva pro sudovi vytraty u tsyvilnykh spravakh: postanova Plenumu Vyshchoho spetsializovanoho sudu Ukrainy z rozghliadu tsyvilnykh i kryminalnykh sprav (2014) [On the application of legislation legal expenses in civil cases: Resolution of the High Specialized Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases] (2014) № 10. Retrieved from: [in Ukrainian].
6. Pro osoblyvosti vykonannia funktsii prokuratury z pytan zakhystu interesiv ditei ta protydii nasylstvu: nakas Heneralnoho prokurora (2020) [About the peculiarities of the performance of the functions of the prosecutor’s office in matters of protection the interests of children and combating violence: Order by Prosecutor General of Ukraine] (2020) № 509. Retrieved from: [in Ukrainian].
7. Zakon Ukrainy “Pro sudovyi zbir” (2011) [Law of Ukraine “On court fee”] (2011) № 3674-VI. Retrieved from: [in Ukrainian].
8. Zakon Ukrainy “Tsyvilnyy protsesualnyy kodeks Ukrainy” (2004) [The Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine] (2004). № 1618-IV. Retrieved from: [in Ukrainian].
9. Shchodo adminastratyvnykh pozoviv mainovoho kharakteru: Lyst vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu (2012) [About administrative claims of a property nature] (2012). № 165/11/13–12. Retrieved from: [in Ukrainian].
10. Berezovska S.V. (2016) Nedoliky sudovoho zboru za podannia administratyvnogo pozovu abo skarhy ta shliahy yikh usunennia [Berezovska S.V. Disadvantages of the court fee for administrative claim or appeals and ways to eliminate them]. Scientific bulletin of the international humanitarian university. Series Jurisprudence, № 22, pp. 54–59.
11. Prytchenko R.S. (2016). Splata sudovoho zbory: problem ta realii zakonodavchoho zabezpechennia [Pritchenko R.S. Payment of court fees: problems and realities of legislative support]. Legal State, № 21, pp. 149–151.
How to Cite
Krasnozhon, O. (2023). ADMINISTRATIVE LAWSUITS OF THE PROSECUTORS IN THE FIELD OF CHILD PROTECTION. Administrative Law and Process, (4(43), 5-15.
Administrative process (Administrative legal proceedings)