ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: MATERIAL, PROCESSUAL AND FORMAL COMPONENTS
The purpose of the paper is to analyze and disclose the issues of theoretical and practical plan that prevent the solution of administrative law legal applying issues, which contain or are connected with the definitions of “substantive and processual law” and “norms substantive and processual law” and the development of theoretical proposals needed to solve the problems of the practical plan. Research methods. The paper uses a comprehensive approach to creating a theoretical picture of the object and the application of the methodological scheme of “double knowledge” about the object as such and the knowledge that describes and depicts it; method of comparative legal and doctrinal knowledge of administrative legislation; method of generalization and modeling of new theoretical knowledge of administrative law. Results. Issues for the further development of theory and practice of administrative law are identified and a theoretical approach for their solution is suggested. It is established that the subject of administrative law requires modeling and legal regulation of an administrative activity according to the scheme of legal certainty by the norms of substantive and formal law. Substantive administrative law consists of rules that describe materialized objects, the title of which defines the basic institutions of administrative law. Formal administrative law consists of norms that determine the process of substantive law formalization according to the procedures of administrative activity, which consist of substantive and processual norms of formal law. The main substantive rules of formal law include public conditions and formalities, as legal means that determine the interaction of subjects in administrative activity and the delimitation of the spheres of norms effect for private and public law. Conclusions. It gives reasons for the position that the practical implementation of approaches based on the theoretical position of the division into substantive and formal administrative law, means the formation of an administrative procedure as a single standard for the whole administrative activity, including judicial.
Averianov, V. (2004). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Akademichnyi kurs: pidruchnyk [Administrative law of Ukraine. Academic course: textbook], in 2 vols., vol. 1: Zahalna chastyna [The general part]. Kyiv : Yurydychna dumka [in Ukrainian].
Alekseev, S. (1999). Pravo: azbuka – teoriya – filosofiya (opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya) [Law: ABC – theory – philosophy (experience of complex research)]. Moscow: Statut [in Russian].
Bocharov, D. (2006). Pravozastosovcha diialnist: poniattia, funktsii ta formy: problemni lektsii [Law enforcement activity: concepts, functions and forms: problem lectures]. Dnipropetrovsk : AMSU [in Ukrainian].
Dashkovska, T. (2015). Normy materialnoho ta protsesualnoho prava: do pytannia spivvidnoshennia [Norms of substantive and procedural law: the question of correlation]. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Odesa : Yurydychna literatura, issue 75, pp. 90–96 [in Ukrainian].
Kelsen, H. (2015). Chistoe uchenie o prave [Pure Theory of Law], transl. from German M. Antonov, S. Lezov. 2nd ed. Saint Petersburg : Izdatel’skiy dom “Alef-Press” [in Russian].
Kuniev, Yu. (2013). Administratyvnyi protses: problemy vyznachennia sutnosti ta zmistu [Administrative process: problems of determining the essence and content]. Publichne pravo, no. 2, pp. 51–56 [in Ukrainian].
Kuniev, Yu. (2008). Obiekt pravoznavstva: systemodiialnisnyi pidkhid [Object of jurisprudence: system-activity approach]. Pravo Ukrainy, no. 2, pp. 32–35 [in Ukrainian].
Kuniev, Yu. (2014). Pravova orhanizatsiia diialnosti mytnoi sluzhby Ukrainy: teoretychni ta metodolohichni osnovy [Legal organization of the customs service of Ukraine: theoretical and methodological foundations]. Doctor’s thesis. Irpin [in Ukrainian].
Kuniev, Yu., Duvinh, V. (2019). Publichno-administratyvna diialnist – obiekt administratyvno-pravovoi nauky [Public-administrative activity is an object of administrativelegal science]. Pravova pozytsiia, no. 4(25), pp. 43–50 [in Ukrainian].
Kurylo, M. (2013). Shchodo unifikatsii pidstav porushen norm protsesualnoho prava [Regarding the unification of the grounds for violations of procedural law]. Pravo i suspilstvo, no. 6, pp. 99–102 [in Ukrainian].
Wikipedia (2021). Materialne pravo [Substantive law]. URL: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Матеріальне_право [in Ukrainian].
Balandin, V., Pavlushina, A. (2001). Printsipy yuridicheskogo protsessa [Principles of the legal process]. Tolyatti: Izdatel’stvo VUiT [in Russian].
Rabinovich, P. (1975). Uprochenie zakonnosti – zakonomernost’ sotsializma: voprosy teorii i metodologii issledovaniya [Consolidation of the rule of law is the regularity of socialism: questions of theory and methodology of research]. Lviv [in Russian].
Barnes, J. (2016). Towards a third generation of administrative procedures. First draft – 2016 Conference on Comparative Administrative Law (April 29–30, 2016), pp. 1–27. URL: https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/conference/compadmin/compadmin16_barnes_towards.pdf [in English].
Pilichowski, E. (ed.) (2021). Implementation of laws on general administrative procedure in the Western Balkans. SIGMA Papers, no. 62. URL: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/e5162057-en.pdf?expires=1643614493&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=4DD3341E7B7D02ABC03E664BF01001B5 [in English].
Kovač, P. (2020). Debureaucratization Limits in Administrative Procedures Codification: Lessons from Slovenia. Administrative Sciences, vol. 11, issue 1. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/1/1/htm [in English].
Ponce, J. (2005). Good Administration and Administrative Procedures. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol. 12, issue 2, pp. 551–588. URL: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1310&context=ijgls [in English].
Pünder, H. (2013). German administrative procedure in a comparative perspective – Observations on the path to a transnational ius commune proceduralis in administrative law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 11, issue 4, pp. 940–961. URL: https://jeanmonnetprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Punder.pdf [in English].
Potěšil, L., Rozsnyai, K., Olszanowski, J., Horvat, M. (2021). Simplification of Administrative Procedure on the Example of the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia, and Hungary (V4 Countries). Administrative Sciences, vol. 11, issue 9. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/1/9/htm [in English].
Siuciński, R. (2020). Administrative procedure as a key factor in development of control over administrative power – a European perspective. Juridical Tribune, vol. 10, issue 3, pp. 427–441 [in English].
Ziekow, J. (2021). Administrative Procedures and Processes. Public Administration in Germany / S. Kuhlmann, I. Proeller, D. Schimanke, J. Ziekow (eds.). London : Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 163–183. URL: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-53697-8_11.pdf [in English].