Methodological bases distinction supervisory and control functions of the state

  • Vitalii Murza Mariupol State Economic and Humanitarian University
Keywords: supervisory function, the control function, the state oversight functions of the state, state

Abstract

In the article noted that the functions of the state shall be defined on the basis of the political, social, economic and territorial organization, the unity which allows characterizing the full range of topical areas of state activity.

It is concluded that under the functions of the state should understand these directions and areas of internal and external activities that through the implementation of tasks in the relevant organizational and legal forms, methods, tools and techniques aimed at the realization of the state of destination.

It is noted that the control is part of the management process, but it is not separated from other functions that at all levels of control and other functions of the management process should be seen as being constantly interact in a closed loop.

Proposed the following definition of the concepts studied: (a) the supervisory function of the state is one of the priorities of government activities, which now requires further study and research. Application of the supervisory functions of public administration is one of the priority areas to improve the system of public administration and practice of implementation of the government; (b) control function of the state – is one of the main activities of the State to establish the actual execution of the laws and deterrence of deviations.

The author summarized that, firstly, the supervisory and control functions of the state are one of the priorities of government activities to promote the rule of law and legality in various spheres of public life. Second, the ratio of state supervision and control provides optimum conditions for civil society mechanism of verifying compliance with applicable laws supervised and controlled objects and subsequent prevention or elimination of revealed violations of the law that does not allow direct intervention in their operational activities. Third, the intensification of the use of supervisory and control functions of the state is one of the priority areas to improve the system of public administration and practice of implementation of the government.

References

Sekretariat Prezydenta Ukrainy: normatyvno-pravovi zasady orhanizatsii ta diialnosti: monohrafiia za red. O. V. Martseliaka. – Kh.: Kharkiv yurydychnyi, 2008. – 304 s.

Zhuravskyi V. S. Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia v Ukraini: pidruch. [dlia stud. vyshch. navch. zakl.] / V. S. Zhuravskyi, V. O. Serohin, O. N. Yar- mysh. – K. : Kontsern «Vydavnychyi Dim «In Yure», 2004. – 672 s.

Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy [uklad. i hol. red. V. T. Busel]. – K.: Irpin: VTF «Perun», 2007. – 1736 s.

Administratyvna (politseiska) diialnist orhaniv vnutrishnikh sprav: pidruchnyk: Zah. chastyna / Yu. I. Rymarenko, Ye. M. Moiseiev, V. I. Olefir [ta in.]. – K.: KNT, 2008. – 816 s.
5. Pohorilko V. F. Funktsii Ukrainskoi derzhavy ta yikh pravovi osnovy / V. F. Pohorilko // Biuleten Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy. – 2004. – № 1. – S. 4-10.

Iliashko O. O. Spivvidnoshennia prokurorskoho nahliadu z derzhavnym pozavidomchym kontrolem za vykonanniam zakoniv / O. O. Iliashko // Visnyk Zaporizkoho yurydychnoho instytutu DDUVS. – 2006. – № 1. – S. 19–28.

Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Akademichnyi kurs: pidruchnyk / red. kolehiia: V. B. Aver’ianov (holova). – T. 1. Zah. chastyna – K.: Vyd-vo «Iurydychna dumka», 2004. – 584 s.

Sovetskoe admynystratyvnoe pravo: uchebnyk / pod red. V. Y. Popovoi, M. S. Studenykynoi. – M. : Yuryd. lyt., 1982. – 286 s.

Baklan O. Kontrolno-nahliadova diialnist ta administratyvnyi prymus v sferi okhorony pratsi: navch. posib. / O. V. Baklan. – K.: Poliprom, 2003. – 168 s.

Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy : pidruchnyk [dlia yuryd. vuziv ta f-tiv] / za red. Yu. P. Bytiaka. – Kh. : Pravo, 2000. – 520 s.

Yarmysh O. N. Mistse ta rol prokuratury v systemi derzhavnoi vlady / O. N. Yarmysh // Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. – 2003. – Vyp. 21. – Ch. 2. – S. 14–19.

Pro Predstavnytstvo Prezydenta Ukrainy v Avtonomnii Respublitsi Krym : Zakon Ukrainy vid 2 bereznia 2000 r., № 1524-III // Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy. – 2000. – № 14. – St. 552.

Shmorhun O. S. Kontrol i nahliad yak vazhlyvi skladovi diialnosti orhaniv publichnoho upravlinnia / O. S. Shmorhun // Borotba z orhanizovanoiu zlochynnistiu i koruptsiieiu (teoriia i praktyka). – 2008. – № 19 // [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu : http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/ Soc_Gum/bozk/19text/g19_17.htm.
Published
2019-02-22
How to Cite
Murza, V. (2019). Methodological bases distinction supervisory and control functions of the state. Administrative Law and Process, (4(6), 46-52. Retrieved from https://applaw.net/index.php/journal/article/view/498
Section
General administrative law