Understanding of administrative responsibility for the application of administrative enforcement by public authorities
Abstract
The Ukrainian state and society put before the issue of the reform of lawful citizens to administrative responsibility. The modern science of administrative law should develop the basic theoretical principles guarantying the legality of citizens to administrative responsibility, which should find its further consolidation in the legislation of Ukraine on administrative offences.
The state should ensure the basic conditions, measures, methods and tools that should be defined in the legislation on administrative offences to enforce the law with attraction of citizens to administrative responsibility and prevent violations of the rights and freedoms of citizens. Their combination is the content of the guarantees of legal bringing of the Ukrainian citizens to administrative responsibility.
The process of reforming the legislation on administrative responsibility requires qualitatively new views on the contents of this Institute and its place in the mechanism of state control. One must get rid of the old ideological dogmas that have long influenced the development of this Institute. The focus on the development of market relations in the economy, the priority of human rights, to a new understanding of the role of the state in society requires appropriate consideration in the development of rules that make up the Institute of administrative responsibility. Today, administrative responsibility is undoubtedly the most common form of legal liability in the legal system of Ukraine and one of the most effective legal instruments in the fight against the most massive wrongful acts, which are administrative violations.
The concept of «administrative enforcement» is much broader than the concept of «administrative responsibility», thus, administrative responsibility is a part of administrative coercion. The measures of administrative coercion shall be established, modified, repealed by act of control depending on the needs. There is not a single act, which would contain the list of coercive measures. The measures of administrative coercion are used by a large number of subjects. Traditionally, the legal liability is associated with the application of measures of state coercion; see it as under the sanctions of legal norms reaction to the offence, as the implementation, application and implementation of the sanctions.
Application of measures of legal liability will result in the offender burdensome consequences of property, moral, personal or other nature, which he must endure and it actually performs. Thus the offender holds the answer to the state for misconduct.
The main problem of legal liability in General and administrative responsibility in particular in modern society is the rule of law, prevention and suppression of crime, the maximum possible compensation of the harm caused to society and the rule of law. Thus, the termination of offenses is forced to stop illegal acts aimed at preventing harmful effects, and ensuring application to the person in fault on recovery.
References
Banchuk O. A. Zmist ta pravova pryroda administratyvnoi vidpovidalnosti / Banchuk O. A., Koliushko I. B. // Problemy systematyzatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia : mat. Mizhn. nauk.-prakt. konf. (m. Simferopol, 7–8 hrudnia 2006 r.). – Simferopol. U 2-kh ch.–Ch. 2. – S. 198–202.
Shchukovska H. V. Deiaki problemy harantii zakonnosti prytiahnennia hromadian Ukrainy do administratyvnoi vidpovidalnosti / Shchukovska H. V. // Problemy pravovoi reformy ta rozbudovy hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini : tezy dopovidei na Tretii zvitnii vseukr. nauk. konf. adʼiunktiv, aspirantiv ta zdobuvachiv. –L.: Lviv. derzh. un-t vnutr. sprav, 2009. – S. 170–173.
Kolpakov V. K. Administratyvna vidpovidalnist (administratyvno-deliktne pravo) : navch. posib. / V. K. Kolpakov. – K.: Yurinkom Inter, 2008. – 256 s.
Lukʼianets D. M. Instytut administratyvnoi vidpovidalnosti: problemy rozvytku: monohrafiia / D. M. Lukʼianets. – K.: In-t derzhavy i prava im. V. N. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy, 2001. –220 s.
Rol V. F. Finansove pravo : navch. posib. / V. F. Rol, V. V. Serhiienko, S. M. Popova. – K.: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 2011. –392 s.
Zahumennyk V. Administratyvna vidpovidalnist problemy ta shliakhy yikh podolannia / Zahumennyk V. // Visnyk prokuratury. – 2008. –№ 2(80). – S. 70–78.
Kurinnyi Ye. V. Administratyvna vidpovidalnist yak vladna forma realizatsii obʼiekta administratyvnoho prava / Kurinnyi Ye. V. // Visnyk Luhan. Akademii vnutr. sprav im. 10-richchia nezalezhnostiUkrainy. –2004. – № 1. – S. 205–212.
Afanasiev K. K. Povtornist yak kvalifikuiucha oznaka skladu administratyvnoho deliktu / Afanasiev K. K. // Problemy systematyzatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia : mat. Mizhn. nauk.-prakt. konf. (m. Simferopol, 7–8 hrudnia 2006 r.). – Simferopol. U 2-kh ch.– Ch.1. – S. 35–41.
Honcharuk S. T. Do pytannia pro poniattia ta sutnist administratyvnoi vidpovidalnosti / Honcharuk S. T. // Problemy systematyzatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia : mat. Mizhn. nauk.-prakt. konf. (m. Simferopol, 7–8 hrudnia 2006 r.). – Simferopol. U 2-kh ch.–Ch.2. – S. 68–71.
Kodeks Ukraynы ob admynystratyvnыkh pravonarushenyiakh (nauch.-prakt. kommentaryi). – Kh.: OOO «Odysei», 2000. –1008 s.
Horodetska I. A. Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Zah. chastyna : navch. posib./ I. A. Horodetska. – Nizhyn: NDU im. M.Hoholia, 2011. –192 s.
Admynystratyvnoe pravo : uchebnyk dlia vuzov. -2-e yzd., zym. y dop. / [Bakhrakh D. N., Rossynskyi B. V., Starylov Yu. N.]. – M.: Norma; 2006. –800 s.
Administratyvna vidpovidalnist v Ukraini : navch. posibnyk. 2-e vyd., vypravl. i dop. / za zah. red. A.T. Komziuka. – Kh.: Vyd-vo Un-tu vnutr.sprav, 2001. – 99 s.
Matios A. V. Administratyvna vidpovidalnist posadovykh osib / Matios A. V. – K.: Znannia, 2007. –223 s.
Sushynskyi O. Instytut vidpovidalnosti u zdiisnenni kontrolnoi vlady / Sushynskyi O. // Visnyk UADU. – 2002. – № 3. – S. 39–48.
Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy / za red. Bytiaka Yu. P. – Kh.: Pravo, 2003. – 576 s.
Syniuta L. L. Pravovoe prynuzhdenye v deiatelnosty hosudarstvennыkh orhanov / Syniuta L. L. // Vestnyk Moskovskoho unyversyteta. Seryia: Pravo. –2002. – № 3. – S. 19–26.
Kolpakov V. K. Kodeks Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia: poshuk novoi paradyhmy / Kolpakov V. K. // Pravo Ukrainy. – 2004. – № 7. – S. 85–89.
