Traditional Ukrainian model of administrative and legal status of state executive service - advantages and disadvantages
Abstract
The generalization of the historical experience of formation and development institute of enforcement, to identify its positive and negative traits, systematization of theoretical and methodological, organizational and legal framework in the science of public administration is insufficient, and therefore requires a detailed study on the optimization of modern executive proceedings. The priority direction of state building is a scientific comparative legal research that has led to the study of institutions of judgment enforcement in individual countries. This approach will promote general improvement to management of executive service and the development of clearly defined recommendations for improving the current legislation of Ukraine. The thesis has proposed one.
The State Executive Service is a specific part of the state, which makes enforcement decisions, ensure protection of human rights and citizen, provides social benefit activities, which should be read as an intellectual, and aimed at an objective exercise of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests both human and society. The specificity of exercising the powers by public authorities is that they act in the subsystem of public law (constitutional, administrative law) for which imperative method - the legal subordination – is natural. On the one hand, the question of competence of state bodies and officials, who have the powers to unilaterally publication of individual orders that determines rights and duties of subordinate and accountable persons; on the other hand - the question of passive personality of subordinate and accountable people, their duties and responsibilities. Will of subordinates is not defining for an issued individual act. The State Executive Service restores the violated rights and freedoms. It should provide inevitability of property and other legal liability of unscrupulous debtors in civil and economic circulation.
References
Klymenko O. S. Administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia diialnosti derzhavnoi vykonavchoi sluzhby shchodo prymusovoho vykonannia rishen mainovoho kharakteru: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. yuryd. nauk: spets. 12.00.07 «Administratyvne pravo i protses; finansove pravo; informatsiine pravo» / O. S. Klymenko. – Dnipropetrovsk, 2011. – 21 s.
Perepelytsia A. I. Orhanizatsiino-pravovi zasady diialnosti derzhavnoi vykonavchoi sluzhby v Ukraini: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia naukovoho stupenia kand. yuryd. nauk: spets. 12.00.07 «Teoriia upravlinnia; administratyvne pravo i protses; finansove pravo» / A. I. Perepelytsia. – Irpin, 2005. – 20 s.
Babych V. A. Derzhavna vykonavcha sluzhba: pravova pryroda ta perspektyvy reformuvannia / V. A. Babych // Advokat. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 25–28.
Krupnova L. Znachennia pryntsypu zakonnosti v Diialnosti Derzhavnoi vykonavchoi sluzhby Ukrainy / L. Krupnova // Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 69–74.
Huk B. M. Osoblyvosti administratyvno-pravovoho statusu Derzhavnoi vykonavchoi sluzhby Ukrainy v umovakh administratyvnoi reformy / B. M. Huk // Publichne pravo. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 86–92.
Klymenko O. S. Pryntsypy diialnosti Derzhavnoi vykonavchoi sluzhby Ukrainy z prymusovoho vykonannia rishen sudiv ta inshykh yurysdyktsiinykh orhaniv / O. S. Klymenko // Pravo i suspilstvo. – 2010. – № 2. – S. 79–85.
Babych V. A. Pryntsypy funktsionuvannia Derzhavnoi vykonavchoi sluzhby / V. A. Babych // Advokat. – 2011. – № 11. – S. 34–37.
Huk B. M. Poniattia derzhavnoi vykonavchoi sluzhby ta yii mistse v systemi orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady Ukrainy / B. M. Huk // Pravo i bezpeka. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 21–28.
Lytvyn N. A. Shliakhy vdoskonalennia diialnosti derzhavnoi vykonavchoi sluzhby Ukrainy / N. A. Lytvyn, L. V. Krupnova // Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys Odeskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. – 2011. – Vyp. № 1. – S. 24–27.
