APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS AND THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

  • Olena Hrytsaienko Cherkasy District Administrative Court
Keywords: administrative proceedings, guaranteeing individual rights, protection of individual rights and freedoms, European Court of Human Rights, Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, law enforcement practice, public and legal relations, judicial protection

Abstract

The objective of this article is to certificate the legal nature of the decisions of the European Courtof Human Rights (starting now referred to as the ECHR), to determine the place of the Conventionon Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (starting now referred to as the Convention) inthe hierarchy of the rule of law, research and elaboration of theoretical and practical provisionson the application of the Convention and the case-law of the ECHR by administrative courts.The author devoted particular attention to exploring the issue of application of provisions of theConvention and the jurisprudence of the ECHR in law enforcement.To achieve the set goals, the content of the Convention and the legislation of Ukraine as the legalbasis for guaranteeing and protecting the rights and freedoms of the individual in the sphereof public legal relations has been analyzed, and theoretical approaches to understanding keyconventional concepts, categories and principles have been elucidated. In addition, the author hasdefined the objectives of the ECHR and the role of the Court’s jurisprudence in law enforcementin Ukraine.The methodological basis of the research became general scientific and uniquelegal methodsto reach knowledge. In particular,scientificlearning methods such as analysis, description,comparison were used. The content of certain concepts had been clarified through a formallogicalapproach,and a comparative legal method had been used in the research of the applicationof the Convention by different States parties.The study found that the case-law of the ECHRtowards Ukraine demonstrated the need for an urgentchange in law enforcement practice and unconditional compliance and application by courts ofthe provisions of the Convention and court decisions of the ECHR. To guarantee the constitutionalright of a person to protection against unlawful decisions, actions or inaction of state bodies and to ensure the right of a person to a fair court during the execution of administrative proceedings,the Convention principles of judicial activity shall be subject to mandatory application, as wellas the Unified requirements of the right of interference in the person’s right.The legislator shouldenshrine these provisions in a procedural law – the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine.The author concluded that ensuring the proper application by the state of the requirements of theConvention and the practice of the ECHR by the administrative Court would guarantee not onlythe implementation of the Convention rights of the individual but also adequate protection of therights and freedoms of the person from unlawful decisions, actions (inaction) of the subjects ofpower in the sphere of public-legal relations.

References

1.Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Law of Ukraine dated from 28.06.1996 no. 254k/96-VR [The Constitution of Ukraine]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR). 1996. no. 30.
2. Basai, O., Koshchynets, V. (2018). Vplyv praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny na formuvannia vnutrishnoho perekonannia suddi pry rozghliadi administratyvnykh sprav.[The influence of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights on the formation of the inner conviction of a judge in administrative cases]. Praktyka Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny v diialnosti orhaniv prokuratury i sudu: vyklyky ta perspektyvy : materialy I Mizhnarodnoi naukovopraktychnoi konferentsii (13 chervnia 2018). Kyiv : Natsionalna akademiia prokuratury Ukrainy. 206 p., pp. 13 [in Ukrainian].
3. Pro ratyfikatsiiu Konventsii pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod 1950 roku, Pershoho protokolu ta protokoliv N 2, 4, 7 ta 11 do Konventsii: Law of Ukraine dated from 17.07.1997 no. 475/97-VR. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/475/97-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text) (acess date: January 10, 2022).
4. Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod : Mizhnarodnyi dokument vid 04.11.1950. [The European Convention on Human Rights]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#n195 (acess date: January 10, 2022).
5. Pro vykonannia rishen ta zastosuvannia praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny : Law of Ukraine dated from 23.02.2006. [On the Fulfillment of Decisions and Application of Practice of the European Court of Human Rights] URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15#Text) (acess date: January 10, 2022).
6. Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy: Law of Ukraine dated from 06.07.2005 no. 2747-IV. [The Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15/ed20170803#Text (acess date: January 10, 2022).
7. Shevchuk, S. (2007). Sudova pravotvorchist: svitovyi dosvid i perspektyvy v Ukraini. [Judicial lawmaking: world experience and prospects in Ukraine]. K. : Referat, pp. 456–457 [in Ukrainian].
8. Sydorenko, O. (2015). Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny yak dzherelo prava Ukrainy. [Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights as a source of Ukrainian law]. Mizhnarodne pravo. pp. 242-250, pp. 246 [in Ukrainian].
9. Blazhivska, N. (2018). Do pytannia pro mistse rishen Yevropeiskoho sudu z pravliudyny u natsionalnii pravovii systemi. [On the question of the place of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the national legal system]. Pidpryiemnytstvo,hospodarstvo i pravo. no. 4. pp. 218–222., p. 221 [in Ukrainian].
10. Dzhenis, M. (1997). Yevropeiske pravo u haluzi prav liudyny: dzherela i praktyka zastosuvannia. [European human rights law: sources and practice]. / [M. Dzhenis, R. Kei, E. Bredli] ; per. z anhl. K. : ArtEk. 624 pp., pp. 45.
11. Andrianov, K. (2002). Pravova pryroda rishen Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny. [The legal nature of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights]. Pravo Ukrainy. no. 3. pp. 37–42., p. 41 [in Ukrainian].
12. Martyn, K. (2015). Mekhanyzmi effektyvnoi realyzatsyy Evropeiskoi konventsyy po pravam cheloveka v Nyderlandakh. [Mechanisms for effective implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights in the Netherlands]. Sovershenstvovanye natsyonalnikh mekhanyzmov effektyvnoi ymplementatsyy Evropeiskoi konventsyy po pravam cheloveka : Mezhdunarodnaia konferentsyia, Sankt-Peterburh, Rossyiskaia Federatsyia, 22-23.10.2015. pp. 24 [in Russian].
13. Videnska konventsiia pro pravo mizhnarodnykh dohovoriv: Konventsiia, dated from 23.05.1969. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_118#Text (acess date: January 10, 2022).
14. Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Marks proty Belhii». [CASE OF MARCKX v. BELGIUM]. 13.06.1979. URL: https://europeancourt.ru/uploads/ECHR_Marckx_v_Belgium_13_06_1979.pdf (acess date: January 10, 2022).
15. Zavhorodnii, V. (2018). Poniattia ta aspekty vplyvu praktyky Yevropeiskoho suduz prav liudyny na yurydychnu diialnist v Ukraini. [Concepts and aspects of the impact of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights on legal activity in Ukraine]. Praktyka Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny v diialnosti orhaniv prokuratury i sudu: vyklyky ta perspektyvy : materialy I Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (13.06.2018). Kyiv : Natsionalna akademiia prokuratury Ukrainy. pp. 76–81, p. 78 [in Ukrainian].
16. Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny vid 12.07.2001r. u spravi «Ferradzini proty Italii» (zaiava no. 44759/98). [Case of Ferrazzini v. Italy]. URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_167 (acess date: January 10, 2022).
17. Pavliukovets,T. (2020). Rol ta mistse rishen YeSPL v ukrainskii sudovii systemi [The role and place of European Court of Human Rights decisions in the Ukrainian judicial system]. URL: https://everlegal.ua/rol-ta-mistse-rishen-espl-v-ukrayinskiy-sudoviy-systemi) [in Ukrainian].
18. Parkhomenko, P. (2018). Deiaki osoblyvosti zastosuvannia praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny v natsionalnomu sudochynstvi: praktychnyi aspect. [Some features of the application of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in national proceedings: a practical aspect]. Praktyka Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny v diialnosti orhaniv prokuratury i sudu: vyklyky ta perspektyvy : materialy I Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (13.06.2018). Kyiv: Natsionalna akademiia prokuratury Ukrainy. p. 141. [in Ukrainian].
19. Volkova, L. (2016). Problemi prymenenyia praktyky Evropeiskoho suda. [Problems of applying the practice of the European Court]. URL: https://sud.ua/ru/news/sud-info/95136-problemi-primeneniya-praktiki-evropejskogo-syda-poyasnila-sydya-kharkovskogo-okryzhnogoadminsyda-l-volkovoj [in Russian].
Published
2022-07-08
How to Cite
Hrytsaienko, O. (2022). APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS AND THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS. Administrative Law and Process, (4(35), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796X.2021.4.02
Section
Administrative process (Administrative legal proceedings)