• Victoria Chaika University of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine
  • Larysa Chaika Research and Educational Centre of Foreign Languages of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Keywords: conflict, contradiction, tax conflict, tax dispute, public and private interests


Purpose. The objective of the article is to establish the content and meaning of conflicts that arise and cease in the field of tax relations. Methods. The evolution of scientific conflict concepts is due to the interdisciplinary approach: emphasis is placed on the impossibility of separating philosophical, social, psycholinguistic and legal aspects of the conflict. Comprehensive and systematic analysis of the “conflict” category was carried out using an integrative approach. Results. Modern approaches to the conflict as an object of scientific analysis are differentiated into two main groups: 1) the conflict is considered in a narrow field sense; 2) the conflict is studied from interdisciplinary positions. The legal nature and attributive properties of the tax conflict are clarified from the standpoint of the tax law theory. There are five groups of factors that confirm the actual existence of conflicting tax relationships. A special attention was paid to the characteristics of the tax dispute (as one of the stages of the tax conflict) and ways to protect the rights of taxpayers. In particular, the issue of self-protection of taxpayers’ rights as a guarantee of the realization of subjective rights and legitimate interests in tax relations and as a basis for preventing tax conflicts and tax disputes was highlighted. Conclusions. It is proved that the basis of any conflict is a contradiction, which plays a systemic role both for certain types of conflict and for different levels of their research. However, the presence of contradictions forms only the preconditions of possible behaviour, while interpersonal relationships – as a social category – play a crucial role in the choice of an individual strategy in communicative interaction. It was substantiated that the tax dispute is a mechanism to guarantee the realization of subjective rights of stakeholders and the balance of public and private interests in the field of taxation, given the following factors: 1) focus on protection and restoration of violated (disputed) rights, further; 2) focus on resolving the tax conflict that has arisen over the exercise of rights and obligations; 3) focus on ensuring stability of conditions to implement the legal norm and optimization of legal regulation; 4) considering the dispute by the state power authorized body ensures stability of the legal system of a society. It is determined that a tax dispute is a tax conflict of the tax relations subjects, submitted for consideration to the authorized jurisdiction body, concerning their mutual rights and obligations, as well as the conditions of their implementation, and which requires a solution based on a legal assessment of the facts and verification of the legality of the government entity’s actions in relation to the taxpayer.


Leung S. (2002) A Discourse Analytical Perspective. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–19.

Nelson C. K. (2001) If it sounds too good to be true, it is: A Wittengensteinian approach to the conflict literature. Language and Communication, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–22.

Antaki C. (1994) Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts. London, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.

Boggs S. T. (1978) The development of verbal disputing in part-Hawaiian children. Language in Society, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 325–344.

Brenneis D. (1988) Language and disputing. Annual Review of Anthropology, no. 17, pp. 221–237.

Eisenberg A. R. & Garvey, C. (1981) Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes, no. 4, pp. 149–170.

Grimshaw A. D. (1990) Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Kotthoff H. (1993) Disagreement and concession in disputes: on the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society, no. 22, pp. 193–216.

Laforest M. (2002) Scenes of family life: complaining in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 34, no. 10–11, pp. 1595–1620.

Pomerantz A. (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.

Schiffrin D. (1985) Everyday argument: The organization of diversity in talk. Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 3. London : Academic Press, pp. 35–46.

Yermolaieva E. N. (2005) Kontsept CONFLICT i ego ob’ektivatsiya v leksikosemanticheskom prostranstve sovremennogo angliyskogo yazyka [The concept of CONFLICT and its objectivation in lexical and semantic space of modern English language] (PhD Thesis), Irkutsk : Kemerovo State University.

Grishina N. V. (2002) Psikhologiya konflikta [Psychology of Conflict]. Saint Petersburg : Piter.

Svetlov V. A. (2001) Analitika konflikta [Conflict Analytics]. Saint Petersburg: Rostok.

Antsupov A. Y. (2005) Konfliktologiya v skhemakh i kommentariyakh [Conflictology with Diagram and Comments]. Saint Petersburg : Piter.

Antsupov A. Y. (2008) Konfliktologiya [Conflictology]. Saint Petersburg : Piter.

Tsiurupa M. V. (2004) Osnovy konfliktologhiji ta teoriji pereghovoriv [Fundamentals of Conflictology and Negotiations Theory]. Kyiv : Kondor.

Vashchenko I. V. (2000) Obshchaya konfliktologiya [General Conflictology]. Kharkiv: Model Vselennoy.

Herasina L. M. (2002) Konfliktologiya [Conflictology]. Kharkiv : Law.

Hobbes T. (1985) Leviathan. London: Penguin Books.

Vasyliuk F. E. (2001) Konflikt [Conflict]. Psikhologiya konflikta [Psychology of Conflict]. Saint Petersburg : Piter, pp. 275–277.

Yefimov O. (2018). Tax Conflict by the Example of Allocation. Recht der Osteuropäischen Staaten (ReOS), no. 3, pp. 86–97.

Chaika V. V. (2018) Pravovi formy realizaciji derzhavnoji podatkovoji polityky Ukrajiny [Legal Forms of Ukrainian State Tax Policy Implementation] (PhD Thesis), Irpin : State Fiscal Service University of Ukraine.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine (2007) Law of Ukraine on the Main Principles of State Supervision (Oversight) in the Area of Commercial Activity dated April 5, 2007 № 877-V. URL: (accessed 30 December 2021).

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine (1996) Constitution of Ukraine dated June 28, 1996 № 254к/96-ВР. URL: (accessed 30 December 2021).

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine (2003) Civil Code of Ukraine dated January 16, 2003 № 435-IV. Retrieved from: (accessed 30 December 2021).

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine (1992) Law of Ukraine on Information dated October 2, 1992 № 2657-XII. URL: (accessed 30 December 2021).

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine (2011) Law of Ukraine on Access to Public Information dated January 13, 2011 № 2939-VI. URL: (accessed 30 December 2021).

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine (2010) Law of Ukraine on Protection of Personal Data dated June 1, 2010 № 2297-VI. URL: (accessed 30 December 2021).

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine (2012) Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine dated January 20, 2012, judicial court case № 2-рп/2012. URL: (accessed 30 December 2021).

Taxlink. All About Taxes (2010) Resolution by the Supreme Court of Ukraine dated December 24, 2010, judicial court case № 21-25а10. URL: (accessed 30 December 2021).

How to Cite
Chaika, V., & Chaika, L. (2022). CONFLICTOLOGY OF TAX LEGAL RELATIONS: THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT. Administrative Law and Process, (1(32), 54-69.
Special administrative law