THE ROLE OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE IN THE FORMATION OF THE CONCEPT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

  • Iryna Boiko Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University
Keywords: administrative procedure, administrative act, judicial practice, principle of legitimate expectations, right of a person to be heard, legitimate interest (trust) of the person in maintaining the administrative act, discretionary powers, termination of an administrative act

Abstract

The article emphasizes the need to adopt a legislative act on administrative procedure in Ukraine,which is conditioned by the European integration aspirations of the state, human-centeredorientation of public administration. In the absence of a single law that would contain therules of administrative procedure, fragmentary legal regulation of the procedure for adoptingadministrative acts, case law plays a significant role in shaping the concept of administrativeprocedure. The purpose of the article is to study the case law in order to outline the positions formulated by the court to understand the content of the administrative procedure, the rulesthat make it up. The study used the following scientific methods: empirical, which was able totrack among a large number of court decisions, which formed positions that embody the basicprinciples and principles of the concept of administrative procedure, and theoretical, includinganalysis and generalization, which allowed to draw conclusions about the role of judicial practicein developing the basic foundations of administrative procedure. Legal procedure, interpreted bythe court as part of the rule of law and the rule of law, is an important guarantee against abuse bypublic authorities in decision-making and actions that must ensure fair treatment of the individual.As a result of the research it was found out that the courts have developed and outlined in theirdecisions a number of positions on understanding certain aspects of administrative procedure: theessence of legal procedure, its significance in administrative and legal regulation; the essence ofthe principle of legitimate expectations; regarding the assessment of the ratio of the violation ofthe administrative procedure with the legality of the adopted act; understanding of a person’s rightto be heard (or the right to participate in administrative proceedings); ensuring the legitimateinterest (trust) of the person in maintaining the administrative act; on the admissibility of evidencein administrative proceedings; impossibility of termination (cancellation) of an administrative act,the effect of which is exhausted by execution, as well as regarding the principles of implementationof discretion by the public administration. The article concludes that the case law forms the basicideas and conclusions that can be embedded in the doctrine of administrative procedure. Thus, infact, the courts fill the gaps in the legal regulation of the procedure for adopting administrative acts.

References

1. Barnes Javier. PROCEDIMIENTO ADMINISTRATIVO: CONCEPTO, FUENTES, ORIGEN Y CLASES. Revista Española de Derecho Administrativo Iberoamericano. Número 1. Diciembre 2019. URL: https://es.lejister.com/articulos.php?Hash=b2205794a35e16ebf8d78121847f0a88&hash_t=8eb4430a448da29a09b77e61ab46be98.
2. Communist Party Releases New Set of NPC-Related Reform Goals in First Five-Year Plan on Building Rule of Law in China. 2021. URL: https://npcobserver.com/2021/01/10/communist-party-releases-new-set-of-npc-related-reform-goals-in-first-five-yearplan-on-building-rule-of-law-in-china/?fbclid=IwAR2M-ppoZgkLYyDir2rubH-5QpWf4MTwsDhK04w9vUotmFKCNpdyMKkxZyVU.
3. Giannini M.S. Il potere discrezionale della pubblica amministrazione – concetti e problemi. Milano : Giuffrè, 1939.
4. Scoca F.G. La discrezionalità nel pensiero di Giannini e nella dottrina successiva. Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico. 2000. No. 4. P. 1054–1055.
5. Грабченко А.І., Федорович В.О., Гаращенко Я.М. Методи наукових досліджень : навчальний посібник. Харків : НТУ «ХПІ», 2009. 142 с. С. 17.
6. Данильян О.Г., Тараненко В.М. Основи філософії : навчальний посібник. Харків : Право, 2003. 352 с. URL: http://library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/4%20KURS/4/1/09H2R9_2.htm.
7. Про заходи щодо впровадження Концепції адміністративної реформи в Україні : Указ Президента України від 22 лип.1998 р. Офіц. вісн. України. 1999 р. № 21. Ст. 943. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/810/98/card6#Public (дата звернення: 10.02.2021).
8. Проєкт Закону України «Про адміністративну процедуру» від 14.05.2020. URL: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=68834.
9. Постанова Верховного Суду від 25 липня 2019 р. № 83331117. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/83331117.
10. Постанова Верховного Суду від 24 жовт. 2019 р. № 851539997. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85153999.
11. Постанова Верховного Суду України від 27 січн. 2015 р. № 43075087. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/43075087.
12. Постанова Верховного Суду України від 23 січн. 2018 р. № 71829364 URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/71829364.
13. Постанова Верховного Суду України від 22 верес. 2020 р. № 92457879. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/92457879.
14. Постанова Верховного Суду України від 03 квіт. 2019 р. № 80926561. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80926561.
15. Постанова Верховного Суду України від 29 квіт. 2020 р. № 89035660. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/89035660.
16. Постанова Верховного Суду України від 04 лист. 2020 р. № 93217974. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/93217974.
17. Стратегія реформування державного управління України на період до 2021 року: схвалена розп. Каб. Мін. України від 24 червня 2016 р. № 474. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/474-2016-%D1%80#Text.
18. Ченерелли А. Административные процедуры в итальянском праве. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/administrativnye-protsedury-v-italyanskom-prave/viewer.
Published
2021-07-23
How to Cite
BoikoI. (2021). THE ROLE OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE IN THE FORMATION OF THE CONCEPT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. Administrative Law and Process, (3(30), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796X.2020.3.03
Section
Administrative process (Administrative legal proceedings)