GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN DEVELOPMENT IN CENTRAL ASIA
Abstract
Transformation in the Central Asia is seen as regards to move towards the market economy, while democratization – rather in in deficit. Nevertheless author sees new signs in the relations of individuals and the state. While the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan introduced new administrative procedural laws, they are so revolutionary or, to the contrary, meaningless that their application is not yet certain or requires continued effort. Not only government resources valued as scarce but legal and administrative sciences are behind needs.
Findings on administrative and constitutional judiciary presented for Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan. In the first state they are rather active, while in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan rather in shadow, while no one in Turkmenistan. The Kyrgyz Republic has recently given its constitutional court control to its Supreme Court.
Public administration in Central Asia author sees as defect, mass media under strict state control, right to a complaint and to a lawsuit as not generally known (kind of exception: Kyrgyz Republic). Presented findings to legal advice and assistance especially in courts valued low or not granted in civil and administrative disputes, legal guarantees of access to justice as uncertain.
“Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI)” are presented and except in accountability of government, rule of law and the control of corruption other points are valued as positive.
Having earlier Russia as a leading example now it qualifies no more, generally there is no modelling for administrative matters and laws. As models author presents sections 9, 10, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28 and some basic principles of the German Federal Administrative Procedure Act.
Valuing findings, some changes named substantial / sustainable, most rather formal of short-lived. Kazakhstan is named in every respect better than Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. Latter states have equally negative reform policy. Except in the Kyrgyz Republic the elections are described as not free and fair.
References
Anti-corruption Reforms in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Progress and Challenges, 2013–2015 / OECD. URL: https://www.oecd.org/corruption/acn/Anti-Corruption-Reforms-Eastern- Europe-Central-Asia-2013-2015-ENG.pdf.
BTI 2018 Country Report: Kyrgyzstan. URL: https://www.bti-project.org/fileadmin/files/BTI/Downloads/Reports/2018/pdf/BTI_2018_Kyrgyzstan.pdf.
Central Asia: Five Years of EU Engagement. Impact on Rights Hampered by Lack of Clear Expectations, Policy Consequences. Human Rights Watch. 2012. June 20. URL: http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/06/20/central-asia-five-years-eu-engagement.
Collins K. Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2006. 370 p.
Das Statistische Bundesamt. URL: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Rechtspflege/GerichtePersonal/Verwaltungsgerichte2100240147004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
Golovko L.V. Politische Grenzen und theoretische Deformationen: wenig Raum für Rechtsreformen in Zentralasien. Jahrbuch zur Organisation für Sicherheit und Zusammenarbeit in Europa (OSZE) 2010. Baden-Baden, 2011. Band 16. S. 119–131.
Gramatikov M., Kabir M. Accessing Justice: Legal Aid in Central Asia and in the South Caucasus. Bratislava : UNDP Regional Centre for Europe and the CIS, 2013. URL: https://www.undp.org/content/dam/rbec/docs/LegalAid_SouthCaucasus&CentralAsia.pdf.
Knieper R., Chanturia L., Schramm H.-J. Das Privatrecht im Kaukasus und in Zentralasien: Bestandsaufnahme und Entwicklung. Berlin, 2010. 660 S.
Kyrgyzstan – Dismissal of a Judge of the Constitutional Chamber: Statement by the President of the Venice Commission. Council of Europe: official site. 2015. June 25. URL: http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/events/?id=2044.
Report of the GIZ Integrity Scan conducted in the Kyrgyz Republic in January 2016 / J.J. Deppe et al. Bishkek : GIZ sector project “Anti-Corruption and Integrity”, 2016. 200 p.
Report of the Supreme Court of Georgia for 2012. Part II: Administrative cases / Supreme Court of Georgia. URL: http://www.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/administraciulieng2012.pdf.
Report of the Supreme Court of Georgia for 2015. Part II: Administrative cases / Supreme Court of Georgia. URL: http://www.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/2015-year-administr.pdf.
Spanger H.-J. Revolution und Stagnation Regionalbericht Postsowjetisches Eurasien (BTI 2016). URL: https://www.bti-project.org/fileadmin/files/BTI/Downloads/Reports/2016/pdf_regional/BTI_2016_Regionalbericht_PSE.pdf.
“Until the Very End”: Politically Motivated Imprisonment in Uzbekistan. Human Rights Watch. 2014. September 25. URL: https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/09/25/until-very-end/politically-motivated-imprisonment-uzbekistan.
“We Are Not the Enemy”: Violations of Workers’ Rights in Kazakhstan. Human Rights Watch. 2016. November 23. URL: https://www.hrw.org/report/2016/11/23/we-are-not-enemy/violations-workers-rights-kazakhstan.
Winter G. Verwaltungsrechtsentwicklung und ihre ausländische Beratung in Transformationsstaaten. Das Beispiel Georgiens. Verwaltungsarchiv: Zeitschrift für Verwaltungslehre, Verwaltungsrecht und Verwaltungspolitik. 2010. № 101. S. 408–436. URL: http://www.gerd-winter.jura.uni-bremen.de/vwrentwicklung.pdf.
Worldwide Governance Indicators. URL: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#home.
Yalovkina A. Kyrgyzstan Judge’s Dismissal Looks Like Government Interference. Institute for War & Peace Reporting: official site. 2015. June 26. URL: https://iwpr.net/global-voices/kyrgyzstan-judges-dismissal-looks-government.
Карасартова Р., Токтакунов Н., Ирискулбеков Э. Правовой анализ реализации норм законодательства Кыргызской Республики в части освобождения судей Конституционной палаты Верховного суда. Институт общественного анализа. 2015. 15 октября. URL: http://www.koom.kg/view_material.php?id=3054.
Коротко о мировой практике медиации. Национальный центр медиации. 2018. 20 февраля. URL: http://www.mediationkg.com/index.php/o-mediatsii/stati.html.
Порохов Е.В. Административные процедуры. Алматы, 2011. URL: https://www.zakon.kz/214693-administrativnye-procedury-e.v.porokhov.html.
Пресс-релизы / Комитет по правовой статистике и специальным учетам Генеральной прокуратуры Республики Казахстан. URL: http://service.pravstat.kz/portal/page/portal/POPageGroup/Services/Pravstat.
Проект Федерального закона № 64090-3 «Об административных процедурах» (внесен в 2001 г., отклонен в 2009 г.). Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина. 2016. № 5. С. 15–56. URL: http://vestnik-msal.ru/articles/article_102615.html.
Старилов Ю.Н. Российский закон об административных процедурах должен стать неотъемлемой частью современного административного законодательства. Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия «Право». 2015. № 3. С. 20–28. URL: http://www.vestnik.vsu.ru/pdf/pravo/2015/03/2015-03-04.pdf.
Судова статистика / Вищий адміністративний суд України. URL: http://www.vasu.gov.ua/sudovapraktika/statistika/.
Сулейменов М.К., Дуйсенова А.Е. Развитие арбитража и медиации в Республике Казахстан. Современные тенденции развития арбитража и медиации в Центрально-Восточной Европе и избранных странах Азии : материалы научной конференции, г. Одесса, 15–16 сентября 2010 г. Одесса, 2010. С. 15–21. URL: http://zangerlf.com/ru/publications/158.
