The Defects of the Juridical Facts and Other Elements of the Set of Facts of the Administrative Proceedings in Ukraine

  • Vitalii Hordieiev Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
Keywords: defect, juridical fact, set of facts, administrative legal proceedings in Ukraine

Abstract

The article accentuates upon occasions when in the course of administrative case hearing there appear defective juridical-factual legal situations connected with ascertainment of defects of juridical facts or other elements of set of facts that prevent administrative legal proceeding from performance of its tasks and qualitative and operative case consideration.

Relevance, timeliness and appropriateness of studies in this field are conditioned by the necessity of avoidance of said defective juridical-factual legal situations, and absence of scientific research into defectiveness of juridical facts or other elements of set of facts.

It is noted that the defect of juridical fact in administrative legal proceeding represents its state/feature/specificity that conditions availability of circumstances that prevent said proceeding from performance of its tasks and qualitative and operative case consideration. The defect of the set of facts in administrative legal proceeding represents the state/feature/ specificity of juridical fact or other elements of the set of facts that prevent said proceeding from performance of its tasks and qualitative and operative case consideration.

It is acknowledged that the formation of the list of defects of juridical facts and other elements of the set of facts would help avoid defective juridical-factual legal situations thus resulting in perfection of administrative legal proceeding participants’ enforcement of their rights and the court’s law-enforcement activity.

Author came to conclusion that the major defects of juridical facts and other elements of the set of facts when lodging a claim to the administrative court are as follows: non-observance of the form and the content of the claim; claimant’s legal incapacity to sue; omission of the legal time limit to address administrative court while the court found no reasons to regard such omission as admissible excuse; failure to comply with the rules of jurisdiction and the court jurisdiction.

References

Rozhkova M. A. Yurydycheskye faktы hrazhdanskoho y protsessualnoho prava: sohlashenyia o zashchyte prav y protsessualnыe sohlashenyia / Rozhkova M. A. – M. : Statut, 2009. – 332 s.

Chuvakova H. M. Defektnist faktychnykh skladiv : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.01 / Chuvakova Halyna Mykhailivna. – O., 2004. – 181 s.

Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy // Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. – 2005. – № 35. – St. 446.

Kolpakov V. K. Yurysdyktsiia administratyvnykh sudiv : monohrafiia : v 2-kh kn. / V. K. Kolpakov, V. V. Hordieiev. –Kh.: Kharkiv yurydychnyi. – Kn. 1. – 2011. – 352 s.

Panchenko O. Problemni pytannia pidsudnosti administratyvnykh sprav / Panchenko O. // Visnyk Vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrainy. – 2008. – № 4 – S. 9–21.
Published
2019-02-22
How to Cite
HordieievV. (2019). The Defects of the Juridical Facts and Other Elements of the Set of Facts of the Administrative Proceedings in Ukraine. Administrative Law and Process, (1(7), 175-184. Retrieved from http://applaw.net/index.php/journal/article/view/474
Section
The general part of the administrative process