Differences between administrative and labour legal relationships in context of processual problem of public service disputes resolution
Abstract
The subjects of proposed paper are administrative and labour legal relationship itself in field of public service, contemporary experience of administrative processual resolving of cases about entering, passing and it discontinuance, expediency of similarly resolving by administrative process rules. The purpose and aims of survey are maintaining and providing of scientific implication about whatever processual norms are complete to resolving Public Service Cases efficiently and given author’s recommendations about same area.
Methodology of paper bases on so common methods of cognition (induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis, etc.) as formal jurisprudence method of scientific investigation. Casestudy compare is used in article proposed as a demonstrative method, with purpose to showing the Main Results of survey evidently.
Survey completed with help of scientific methodology instruments permit provides several implications, by doctrine maintained:
1. There are four substantive differences between administrative and labour legal relationship: а) on way of regulation; b) on effects of imperative intervention; c) on regulative significance of local norms; d) on valued-principles’ component of social guaranteeing and securing relationships.
2. The public services on indication of competences given are two-side as legal participants: they are authority’s representatives, from the one hand, and workers (servicemen), the labour law fellows, from other.
3. In case of creation and pass in Ukraine of Labour Processual Code valid regulations of Administrative Processual Code of Ukraine about resolving the cases about entering, passing and it discontinuance of public service by Administrative Courts ought be repealed, and same cases need to put on jurisdiction of Labour Courts according to the labour processual law’ rules.
It allows to relieve Administrative Courts of unusual for their jurisdiction (in substantive reasons) cases, as well as avoid undesirable processual analogy, improving of courts’ defense level of servicemen’ labour rights on expanses of our state. At last, it confirms with specific of labour legal relationship and permits to outline a sharp restriction between administrative and labour law. In same practical implications consist on value and originality of proposed paper.
At same time, for tasks of furthermore differentiation of legal regulation of labour and administrative legal relationships, studying of contemporary criteria of labour and administrative disputes classification, legally-comparative investigations in this field, acquaintance and scientific estimation of international standards in same field may be devoted the further investigations with purpose of scientific resolving of law efficiency problems, at whole.
References
Azimov, Ch.N. (1995). O sootnoshenii chastnogo i grazhdanskogo prava [On the relationship between private and civil law]. Problemy zakonnosti: respublikanskiy mezhvedomstvennyy nauchnyy sbornik, iss. 30, pp. 87–91.
Aleksandrov, N.G. (1948). Trudovoye pravootnosheniye [Labour law-relationship]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat. [in Russian].
Baru, M.I. (1966). Okhrana trudovoy chesti po sovetskomu zakonodatelstvu [The professional honor security according Soviet legal framework]. Moscow. [in Russian].
Bugrov, L.Yu. (1995). Ostanetsya li trudovoye pravo samostoyatelnoy otraslyu prava? [Will labor law remain an independent branch of law?]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, no. 9, pp. 38–39.
Venediktov, S.V. (2011). Teoretyko-pravovi zasady suchasnoi kontseptsii trudovoho pravovidnoshennia v Ukraini: monohrafiia [Theoretical and legal principles of the modern concept of labor relations in Ukraine: monograph]. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina. [in Ukrainian].
Thomas, M. (2011). Global Unions, Local Labour, and the Regulation of International Labour Standards: Mapping ITF Labour Rights Strategies. York: York University. [in English].
Zhernakov, V.V. (2006). Do pytannia pro pravove rozuminnia pratsi ta trudovykh vidnosyn [About legal mention of work and labour relationships]. Derzhava i pravo. Seriia “Yurydychni i politychni nauky”, iss. 34, pp. 307–311.
Zhernakov, V.V. (2013). Problemy obespecheniya organizatsii truda sredstvami trudovogo prava [The problems of labour organization by labour law provisions]. Aktualni problemy trudovoho prava i prava sotsialnoho zabezpechennia: tezy dop. ta nauk. povidomlen uchasnykiv V Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kharkiv, 27–28 veresnia 2013 r.), pp. 118–124.
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2016). Pro derzhavnu sluzhbu: Zakon Ukrainy [On the Civil Service: The Law of Ukraine]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, no. 4, art. 43.
Zarzhytskyi, O.S. (2008). Pro trudovi protsesualni pravovidnosyny [About the labour processual legal relationships]. Pravo Ukrainy, no. 3, pp. 65–68.
Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen (za vidpovidnymy optsiiamy zvernennia) [The Unified Statutory Database of Courts’ Decisions (by relevant options of address to)]. Retrieved from: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua.
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2005). Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy [The Administrative Processual Code of Ukraine]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, no. 35–37, art. 446.
Kozub, I.H. (2011). Mistse trudovoho prava v systemi prava Ukrainy [The place of labour law in legal framework of Ukraine]. Yurydychna Ukraina, no. 2, pp. 57–61.
Kolosov, I.V. (2018). Actual problems of particular procedure’ forms using in collective labour disputes: ILO’s standards and international review. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava: zbirnyk naukovykh prats, Odesa: Helvetyka, iss. 80, pp. 71–88.
Kondratyev, R.I. (1977). Sochetaniye tsentralizovannogo i lokalnogo pravovogo regulirovaniya trudovykh otnosheniy: monografiya [Combination of central and local legal regulation of labour relationships: monograph]. Lvov: Vishcha shkola. [in Russian].
Kostyan, I.A., Piskarev, I.K., Shelomov, B.A. (2003). Zashchita trudovykh prav rabotnikov [Defense of workers’ legal rights]. Chelovek i trud, no. 8, pp. 27–41.
Kostyan, I.A., Piskarev, I.K., Shelomov, B.A. (2003). O spetsializirovannykh sudakh po trudovym delam i Trudovom protsessualnom kodekse [About special Labour Court and Labour Processual Code]. Khozyaystvo i pravo, no. 8, pp. 27–40.
Bezzub, B.S., Holiak, L.V., Kisilevych, O.M. et al. (2005). Porivnialne trudove pravo: navch. posibnyk [Comparative Labour Law: tutorial]. Kyiv: MAUP. [in Ukrainian].
Protsevskiy, A.I. (1979). Predmet sovetskogo trudovogo prava: monografiya [The Object of Soviet Labour Law: monograph]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura. [in Russian].
Sliusar, A.M. (2010). Klasyfikatsiia sub’iektiv trudovoho prava Ukrainy [Classification of Labour Law Participants of Ukraine]. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Kharkiv: Pravo, no. 4(63), pp. 195–205.
Tal, L.S. (1913). Trudovoy dogovor. Tsivilisticheskoye issledovaniye. Obshchiye ucheniya [The Labour Contract. Civility survey. Common doctrine]. Yaroslavl. [in Russian]
Prylypko, S.M., Yaroshenko, O.M., Moroz, S.V., Malynovska, K.A. (2013). Ukladennia trudovoho dohovoru: teoretyko-prykladne doslidzhennia: monohrafiia [The Labour Contract’s singing: theoretical survey: monograph]. Kharkiv: Yurait. [in Ukrainian].
Yakovliev, O.A. (2013). Trudove pravo Ukrainy: teoretychna kharakterystyka v aspekti podilu prava na pryvatne i publichne [The Labour Law of Ukraine: theoretical description in context of law’ division on private and public]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. Seriia “Pravo”, no. 1082, pp. 115–119.
Yaroshenko, O.M. (2007). Dzherela trudovoho prava Ukrainy [The Sources of Ukrainian Labour Law] (The dissertation author’s abstract for the degree of Doctor of Law), Kharkiv: Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. [in Ukrainian].
