Actual issues on cognizance in the administrative legal proceeding of Ukraine

  • Valentyna Zui Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University
Keywords: cognizance, administrative legal proceeding, rules, types of cognizance, institute, subject cognizance, territorial cognizance, instance cognizance, cognizance of several interconnected demands

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issue of the day, that is the definition of essence of such legal concept as a cognizance and the determination of its rules. In the article scientific positions are expounded in relation to scope of the concept «cognizance», the author definition has been formulated . The types of cognizance and its rule are examined.

References

Hordieiev V. V. Aktualni pytannia vyznachennia predmetnoi pidsudnosti administratyvnykh sprav / V. V. Hordieiev // Visnyk Vyshchoi rady yustytsii. – 2007. – № 3(7). – S. 25–41.

Vatamaniuk R. V. Instytut pidsudnosti v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy : avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.07 / R. V. Vatamaniuk. – L., 2011. – 21 s.

Osadchyi A. Yu. Instytut pidsudnosti v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi / A. Yu. Osadchyi // Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava : zb. nauk. pr. – O., 2007. – № 43. – S. 90–94.

Kolpakov, V. K. Yurysdyktsiia administratyvnykh sudiv : monohrafiia : v 2 kn. / V. K. Kolpakov, V. V. Hordieiev. – Kh.: Kharkiv yuryd., 2011. – Kn. 1. – 352 s.

Biluha S. V. Poniattia i znachennia instytutu pidsudnosti v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi / S. V. Biluha // Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava. – 2011. – № 1. – S. 253–258.

Panchenko O. Problemni pytannia pidsudnosti administratyvnykh sprav / O. Panchenko // Visnyk Vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrainy. – 2008. – № 4. – S. 9–21.

Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy: vid 6 lypnia 2005 r. № 2747-IV // Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. – 2005. – № 35–36, 37. – St. 446.

Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinymy podanniamy 49 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhen chastyny chetvertoi statti 18, statti 171-1, chastyny pershoi statti 180 Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy, 50 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhen chastyny chetvertoi statti 18, chastyn druhoi, tretoi, p’iatoi statti 171-1, chastyn druhoi, shostoi statti 183-1 Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy ta 54 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhen chastyny pershoi statti 89 Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv», chastyny chetvertoi statti 18, statti 171-1 Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy (sprava pro pidsudnist okremykh katehorii administratyvnykh sprav) vid 29 serpnia 2012 r. № 16-rp/2012 // Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy. – 2012. – № 70. – St. 2840.

Matviichuk V. K. Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar do Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy : v 2 t. / V. K. Matviichuk, I. O. Khar; red. V. K. Matviichuk. – Vyd 2-e zmin. i dopov. – K.: Alerta, KNT, 2007. – T. 1. – 787 s.
Published
2019-02-22
How to Cite
Zui, V. (2019). Actual issues on cognizance in the administrative legal proceeding of Ukraine. Administrative Law and Process, 3(Ювілейний), 245-252. Retrieved from http://applaw.net/index.php/journal/article/view/409
Section
The general part of the administrative process