ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACT IN THE PROCEDURE OF THE UNFORCED EXPROPRIATION: JUSTIFICATION AND ADVISABILITY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION

  • Anastasia Antonenkо Institute of Law of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Keywords: administrative contract, expropriation contract, contract of redemption for public needs, unforced expropriation, alienation of private property objects for public needs, system of administrative contracts, features of contract of redemption, features of administrative contracts.

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is justification of the concept of the contract of redemption as an administrative contract and proving of the advisability of its implementation in Ukrainian procedure of the unforced expropriation. Methods. The research methodology consists of general and special methods of scientific cognition, including comparative and legal, systematic and structural methods, deduction, induction, analysis, synthesis, etc. Results. Main Features of administrative contracts, which are determined on the normative and scientific levels, are compared with features of the contract of redemption for public needs in the first part of the article. As a result the compliance of the contract of redemption with the requirements for administrative contracts is approved. Certain criteria according to which scholars and courts of European states classify the expropriation contract as administrative-legal are highlighted in the second part of the article. This allowed to further emphasizing the affiliation of the contract of redemption to administrative contracts. The place of the expropriation contract at the system of administrative contracts of certain European states is considered in the third part of the article. It is highlighted one of the features of the expropriation procedure, according to which expropriation contract radically is different from private law agreements and which related to the possibility of concluding a partial agreement. Conclusions. In the conclusions to the article it is summarized that the contract of redemption as an idea, a concept, which is enshrined in Part 3 of Art. 153 of the Civil Code of Ukraine and follows from the essence of the expropriation procedure, belongs to administrative contracts, which is confirmed by the analysis and full compliance of its features with the features of administrative contracts in domestic and foreign theory of administrative law, as well as analysis of regulations, judicial practice and legal doctrine of European countries, especially Germany, Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

References

1. Antonenko, A. V. (2020). Expropriation Agreement: Foreign Experience for Ukraine. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies. No 4(115). 5–9 [in Ukrainian].
2. Antonenko, A. (2021). The reconsideration of concepts of understanding the legal nature of expropriation. ReOS. No 1. 4–10 [in Ukrainian].
3. Antonenko, A. (2019). Pro prychyny vidsutnosti administratyvno-pravovykh doslidzhen problematyky z vidchuzhennia ob’iektiv pryvatnoi vlasnosti dlia suspilnykh potreb chy z motyviv suspilnoi neobkhidnosti [Why there are no administrative-law studies of the issue relating to private ownership alienation for the social needs and on the grounds of social necessity]. Pravo Ukrainy. No 7. Рp. 247–263 [in Ukrainian].
4. Bashmakov, A. A. (1891). Osnovnyja nachala ipotechnago prava : lekcii [Basic principles of mortgage law]. Libava : Lito-Tipografija M. Petersona [in Russian].
5. Land Code of Ukraine from October 25 2001, No 2768-III (2002). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). No 3–4. Art. 27. Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://zakon.rada.gov. ua/laws/show/2768-14#Text [in Ukrainian].
6. The Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine from July 6, 2005 No 2747-ІV, as amended by the law from October 3, 2017 (2005). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). No 35–36, No 37. Art. 446. Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/2747-15#Text [in Ukrainian].
7. Constitution of Ukraine from June 28 1996, 254-к/96-ВР (1996). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). No 30. Art. 141. Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
8. Kuibida R. (2008). Problema administratyvnoho dohovoru u zakonodavstvi, teorii, na praktytsi [The problem of administrative contract in law, theory, in practice]. Derzhavni zakupivli. No 12(54). 28–32. Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://www.pravo.org.ua/ua/news/judiciary/2621- [in Ukrainian].
9. Law of Ukraine on alienation of land plots, other real estate objects located on them, which are in private ownership, for public needs or for reasons of public necessity from November 17 2009, No 1559-VІ. (2010). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). No 1. Art. 2. Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1559-17#Text [in Ukrainian].
10. Suietnov Ye. P. (2013). Iurydychna pryroda uhody, shcho ukladaietsia pid chas vykupu zemelnoi dilianky ta rozmishchenoho na nii nerukhomoho maina dlia suspilnykh potreb [The legal nature of the agreement which is concluded during the purchase of the land and immovable property located on it for public needs]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu : Seriia Pravo. No 23 (Pt. 2, Vol. 2). 63–67 [in Ukrainian].
11. Tarasov I. T. (1910). Lekcii po policejskomu (administrativnomu) pravu. Tom vtoroj. Obshhaja chast’ [Lectures on police (administrative) law. Volume two. Common part]. Moscow : Pechatnja A. I. Snegirevoj [in Russian].
12. Civil Code of Ukraine from January 16 2003, No 435-ІV (2003). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). No 40–44. Art. 356. Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/435-15 [in Ukrainian].
13. Antonenko, A. (2020). Ongoing discussion regarding the correlation between expropriation and sales. Administrative law and process. No 2 (29). 30–43 [in English].
14. Auszug aus dem Urteil der I. öffentlichrechtlichen Abteilung vom 23. März 1988 № 114 Ib 142 i.S. Interchemie AG gegen Kanton Zug und Eidg. (1988). Retrieved October 31, 2021 from http://relevancy.bger.ch/php/clir/http/index.php?highlight_docid=atf%3A%2F%2F114-IB- 142%3Ade&lang=de&type=show_document [in German].
15. Baugesetzbuch (BauGB) : vom 23. Juni 1960, Stand am 10. September 2021 (1960). Retrieved October 31, 2021 from http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bbaug/BJNR003410960. html#BJNR003410960BJNG001804116 [in German].
16. Bundesgericht : Urteil vom 28. Juni 2010 № 4A_116/2010 (2010). Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://www.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/de/php/aza/http/index.php?highlight_docid=aza%3A %2F%2F28-06-2010-4A_116-2010&lang=de&type=show_document&zoom=YES& [in German].
17. Bundesgesetz über die Enteignung (EntG) : vom 20. Juni 1930 № 711, Stand am 1. Januar 2021 (1930). Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://www.admin.ch/opc/de/classifiedcompilation/ 19300026/index.html [in German].
18. Bundesverwaltungsgericht : Urteil vom 21. Oktober 2015 № A-4873/2014 (2015). Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://entscheide.weblaw.ch/cache.php?link=21-10-2015-A-4873-2014 [in German].
19. Enteignungsgesetz des Kantons Wallis : vom 08.05.2008, Stand am 1. Januar 2010 (2008). Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://lex.vs.ch/app/fr/texts_of_law/710.1/versions/1964?all_ languages=true&diff=split [in German].
20. Fleischmann, F., Boxler, A. (2019). Übungsbuch Verwaltungsrecht. Repetitionsfragen, Übungsfälle und bundesgerichtliche Leitentscheide. 3., überarbeitete Auflage. Zürich: Orell füssli Verlag [in German].
21. Gesetz über das Verfahren in Expropriationsfällen des Fürstentums Liechtenstein: vom 23. August 1887, in der Fassung vom 1959 (1887). Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://www.gesetze.li/konso/1887004000 [in German].
22. Gesetz über die Enteignung des Kantons Bern : vom 03.10.1965, Stand am 01. Januar 2011 (1965). Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://www.belex.sites.be.ch/frontend/versions/ 563?locale=de [in German].
23. Heintzen, M. (2003). Der verwaltungsrechtliche Vertrag : Vorlesung. Grundkurs Öffentliches Recht III – Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht. Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://www.jura.fu-berlin.de/fachbereich/einrichtungen/oeffentliches-recht/lehrende/heintzenm/ veranstaltungen/archiv/0203ss/v_GK_OER_III/030617_vorlesung.pdf [in German].
24. Kley, A. (1998). Grundriss des Liechtensteinischen Verwaltungsrecht. Vaduz: Liechtensteinische Akad. Ges. [in German].
25. Labský J., Dudák V. & Partners. (2017). Proces vyvlastnění v českém právním řádu (1. část). Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://stavba.tzb-info.cz/normy-a-pravni-predpisyhruba- stavba/16546-proces-vyvlastneni-v-ceskem-pravnim-radu [in Czech].
26. Löher, A. (2009). Der öffentlich-rechtliche Vertrag, §§ 54 ff. VwVfG : Übung zu Vorlesungen im Verwaltungsrecht. Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://www.uni-trier.de/fileadmin/fb5/prof/ OEF005/Andrea__Verwaltungsrecht_/Fall_8/D_OER_Vertrag.pdf [in German].
27. Öffentlich-rechtlicher Vertrag über Kosten der Fleischbeschau : Urteil von VG Sigmaringen 1. Kammer vom 16.07.2001, Az. 1 K 2682/99 (2001). Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://www.landesrecht-bw.de/jportal/?quelle=jlink&docid=MWRE101220300&psml=bsbawue prod.psml&max=true&doc.part=L&doc.norm=all [in German].
28. Ruch, A. (2009). Einführung in das öffentliche Recht : Skript zu dem Vorlesungen. Grundzüge des Rechts Teil II. Zürich: Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich. Retrieved October 31, 2021 from http://webarchiv.ethz.ch/ruch/ruch/skripte/Einf_oeff_Recht090113_ nachgefuehrt.pdf [in German].
29. Schädler, E. (2018). Art. 35. Kommentar zur liechtensteinischen Verfassung : Online- Kommentar / P. Bussjäger, A. Gamper, L. Langer, E. Schädler, P. M. Schiess Rütimann; Liechtenstein- Institut (Hrsg.) (bearb.). Bendern. Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://verfassung.li/Art._35#a.29_ Verfahren [in German].
30. Schweizerische Bundesgericht (2016). I. öffentlich-rechtliche Abteilung : Urteil vom 10. August 2016 № 1C_613/2015. Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://www.bger.ch/ext/ eurospider/live/de/php/aza/http/index.php?highlight_docid=aza%3A%2F%2F10-08-2016-1C_6 13-2015&lang=de&type=show_document&zoom=YES& [in German].
31. Thüringer Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz (ThürVwVfG) in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 1. Dezember 2014 (2014). Retrieved October 31, 2021 from http://landesrecht.thueringen. de/jportal/?quelle=jlink&query=VwVfG+TH&psml=bsthueprod.psml&max=true&aiz=true#jlr- VwVfGTH2014pG13 [in German].
32. Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz (VwVfG) : vom 25.05.1976, Stand am 04. Mai 2021 (1976). Retrieved October 31, 2021 from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vwvfg/VwVfG.pdf [in German].
33. Wille, H. (2004). Liechtensteinisches Verwaltungsrecht. Ausgewählte Gebiete. Liechtenstein Politische Schriften. Band 38. Schaan: Verlag der Liechtensteinischen Akademischen Gesellschaft [in German].
Published
2022-05-20
How to Cite
AntonenkоA. (2022). ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACT IN THE PROCEDURE OF THE UNFORCED EXPROPRIATION: JUSTIFICATION AND ADVISABILITY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION. Administrative Law and Process, (1(36), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796X.2022.1.01
Section
General administrative law